Follow Capnography / Bhavani Shankar Kodali     Twitter  

A Comprehensive Educational Website (established 1998)

Designed, Produced, and maintained (Edition 10, March 2019) by 

Bhavani Shankar Kodali MD

Response Time of Analyzer

Physics of Capnography

Bhavani Shankar Kodali MD

 

Factors affecting IR Spectrography

 

 
 

Slow analyzers distort CO2 wave forms

slow response of capnographs can distort CO2 waveforms

 

2008-07-29Response time (Components) What is it? Affect on CO2
Transit time Time to move from point of sampling to point of measurement Underestimation due to dispersion of gases at longer transit times
Rise time (T70/T90) Time to change in response to a step changes in CO2. Abnormal wave forms, reduce slope of phase II at longer rise times

 

Response time can be reduced by

Use of more powerful amplifiers

Minimizing the volume of the sampling chamber and tubes

Use of relatively high sampling flow rates (150 ml-min-l)

 

For accurate measurements of CO2, a capnograph needs a rapid response time. There are two components of a response time. The transit time and the rise time.1 The transit time is the time required for the sample to move from the point of sampling to the detector cell. Prolonged transit time delays the appearance of the waveform at the detector, which causes a phase shift, but no distortion. However, a bolus of gas is subjected to dispersal caused by convection and diffusion during transit down the catheter. Such a dispersal converts a square wave front into a sigmoid shape, with loss of the highest and lowest gas concentration peaks. This results in an underestimation of PETCO2, particularly in children. The extent of the error increases with increased length and width of the sampling tube, reduced sample flow rate (50 ml.min-l) and higher breathing frequency of the patient (more than 31 breaths min-l ).2,3 The rise time (T90)is the time taken by the output from the capnometer to change from 10% of the final value to 90% of the final value in response to a step change in PC02. Alternatively, rise time may be specified as T70 which is the time taken to change from 10% to 70% of the final value.4 The rise time is dependent upon the size of the sample chamber and the gas flow.1 Slower flow rates increase the time required to flush the infra-red sample cell, which can increase the rise time. The rise times of capnographs for clinical use range from 50-600 ms. Carbon dioxide waveform is a function of rise time of the capnometer. Prolonged rise time can reduce the slope of phase II resulting in an underestimation of anatomical dead space.3,5 The rise time of commercially available CO2 analyzers is fast enough to measure PETCO2 in adults, with 5% accuracy (less than 30 breaths min-l). However, when the ventilatory rate is high, as in children, faster analyzers with rise time (T70) of 80 ms are necessary to measure PETCO2 values with 5% accuracy (at 100 breaths min-l and l:E ratios less than 2:1).4 The response time of the C02 monitors has been considerably reduced in newer units by (i) the use of more powerful amplifiers, (ii) minimising the volume of the sampling chamber and tubes and (iii) the use of relatively high sampling flow rates (150 ml-min-l). In order to achieve predictable PETCO2 values and C02 waveforms it is recommended that the response time of the analyzer be less than the respiratory cycle time of the patient.6


1. Parbrook GD, Davis PD, Parbrook EO. Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. In: Basic Physics and Measurement in Anaesthesia. 3rd ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990257-64.

2. From RP, Scamman FL. Ventilatory frequency influences accuracy of end-tidal CO2 measurements: analysis of seven capnometers. Anesth Analg 1988;67:884-6.

3. Pasucci RC, Schena JA, Thompson JE. Comparison of a sidestream and mainstream capnometer in infants. Crit Care Med 1989;17:560-2.

4. Brenner JX, Westenskow DR. How the rise time of carbon dioxide analysers influences in accuracy of carbon dioxide measurements. Br J Anaesth 1988;61:628-38.

5. Fletcher R, Werner O, Nordstrom L, Jonson B. Sources of error and their correction in the measurement of carbon dioxide elimination using the Siemens-Elema CO2analyzer. Br J Anaesth 1983;55:177-85.

6. Schena J, Thompson, Crone RK. Mechanical influences on the capnogram. Crit Care Med 1984;12:672-4.


previous    main